Astrologers - Please explain

Can astrolgers explain the following :
>
> 1. When thousands of people die in a catastrophe like earthquake or bomb blast, does that imply that all those people had death written in their kundlis at that particular point of time?
>
> 2. When several children are born at the same place at same time (this happens in many big hospitals), why isn't the fate of all these children the same. If one says that there was minute difference in actual time of birth, in that case, how come predictions for other people can come true even with approximate record of time of birth. If astrology has to be true and yet explain difference in fate of people born within same few minutes at a particular place, it can be based only upon a record of time which is accurate to fraction of a second.
>
> 3. Which should be the time to be considered as birth-time? The time when the first part of child comes out of womb or the time when it is completely into the world. The process of child-birth doesnt happen in a flash. What about the case of twins?
> And if the logic of influence of energy waves and gravitation etc is to be accepted, then this should begin from the very moment soul enters the embryo. Why not then take this time of birth? Further the science of astrology offers no place for crude approximations in time of birth. It has to be accurate upto at least the minute. Thus what to do about children born through ceaserean operation.
>
> 4. As per the rule of famous sadhe saati of hani, the fate should repaet after 30 years since saturn travels in one house for 2.5 years and has to complete 12 houses for a full circle. But why isnt that happen with anyone.
>
> 5. As per mangal dosh, if one of the spouse is mangalik and other is not, there is unhappiness and fear of death in life. But what if the non-mangal partner has a happy marital life and long age written in his/her kundli.
>
> 6. there is a fraud of muhurt according to which work started at correct muhurat gives auspicious result. However if the right result is already written in my kundli, then muhurat should not matter. Thus either muhurat'logy is correct or astrology or both are wrong. Both contradict each other and hence cannot be true simultaneously.
>
> 7. Even in Muhurat logy, which should be the time to be considered: The time of formal beginning or time i started thinking about the task. One's preparation of task begins the moment the first thought comes, so why should a formal beginning of task be considered as time of muhurat.
>
> 8. Why do planets influence different people with same body constitution so differently. The effect of radiations and waves can vary in degree but cannot be entirely different for people of same race, same place, same food habit, same blood group etc etc.
>
> It is a fraud that people perperate by claiming astrology to be of vedic origin. I challenge the entire population of astrolgers and their believers to show one single verse in vedas that support astrology. Read the veads and you will find almost the entire vedas fiercely opposing minutest of fatalism. Further, why could not rishis see Ram's vanvaas and Mahabharat happenning and other such crucial events of pre-kalyug history?
>
> As regards predictions that come out very true, there can be one of the following cases:
> 1. They are intelligent analysis of present and projection of future based on that. This is called foresight and the truly wise do possess this quality.
> 2. Others are random guesses. later out of several guesses made, few come true. then the proponents of fatalism just focus on guesses which came true, publicize it bit too much and remain silent about , rather hide the predictions which failed.
> 3. Third, like those of Chiero someone mentioned are just false stories which you would read only in books of astrology. This is just a gimmick to sell such books. >
> 4. Another category is of prophecies of people like Nostradamus who uttered out something in the vaguest of terms. Later when some event happened, people interpreted the vague utterings accordingly. Of course such predictions do show 95% accuracy!!! But only on events that have already happened.
> If any astrolger has the might, give an account of at least the major events to happen in next few months with dates and show an accuracy of 95%. .
> No one will be able to do so except making random guesses like there will be terrorism, death of important personality, tension at border, instability in governement, depression in market, etc etc.
>
> I request all aryagan to shed the sanskars of any fatalism and get into the purusharth mode. We have to really put the gravest of efforts to reestablish the vedic order and even the slightest of such tendency will only make the dream impossible.